Enter a keyword(s) below to search this site
 
Thursday, September 09, 2010
TEXT SIZE                   ON THE RADIO | ON TELEVISION | IN THE COURTS | SUPPORT OUR EFFORTS | INVITE FRIENDS
 
In The News
 
ACLJ: Senate Must Ask Tough Questions of Judge Sotomayor on Constitution and Judicial Philosophy   

July 13, 2009

(Washington, DC) – The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), focusing on constitutional law, today urged members of the Senate Judiciary Committee to ask the tough questions of Judge Sonia Sotomayor regarding her view of the Constitution and her judicial philosophy as confirmation hearings get underway for the nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court.

“The Senate must fulfill its constitutional role in providing advice and consent and that means asking the tough, in-depth questions about Judge Sotomayor’s view of the Constitution and her judicial philosophy,” said Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel of the ACLJ.  “What does Judge Sotomayor believe is the proper role of judges?  How does she view her role as a judge?  These are important questions that deserve straight-forward answers.  A Supreme Court appointment is the lasting legacy of a President.  And, as President Obama moves to reshape the federal judiciary, it’s critical that the American people understand the judicial philosophy and temperament of Judge Sotomayor.  Let’s not forget the scope and intensity of questions posed to President Bush’s Supreme Court nominees – John Roberts and Samuel Alito.  The questioning of Judge Sotomayor must be direct, focused and in-depth.  The nominee must answer the questions clearly and without reservation.  The American people deserve nothing less.”
 
Led by Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow, the American Center for Law and Justice focuses on constitutional law and is based in Washington, D.C.

  RELATED DOCUMENTS IN JUDICIAL NOMINEES
UPI News - Legal Sparring Over Prayer Still Unsettled

Politico - Kagan Vote Warns of Battles to Come

ACLJ Urges Supreme Court to Back AZ Tuition Tax Credit Program

WorldNetDaily - Alito: Supremes Endorse 'Viewpoint Discrimination' - 'Religious Groups Not Permitted to Limit Membership to Students with Shared Beliefs'

ACLJ Disappointed in Supreme Court Decision that Damages Constitutional Rights of Religious Organizations


Full Issue Brief